# Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs GPT-4.1 mini

> Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 33.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite-vs-gpt-4-1-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 32

## Summary

- They share 32 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 9 categories and GPT-4.1 mini in 1 category; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads 27.8 to 10.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-1: 53.5% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 3.5% for GPT-4.1 mini.
- GPT-4.1 mini is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1.05M.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 33.5 |
| Rank | 113 | 232 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | $1.60 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.1 (#96)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 30.4 (#286)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 41.3% | 40.4% |
| WeirdML | 39% | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1367 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 23.9% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 32.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 48.9% |
| CadEval | — | 16% |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 28.6 (#82)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 33.0 (#52)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 50.5% |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#95)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 10.9 (#335)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | 0% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | 3.5% |
| CritPt | 0% | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | 7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | 1349 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | 7% |
| DTBench | 83.5% | 68.8% |
| LMCA | 37.6% | 21.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.12 | 135.01 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 48.6% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#245)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 23.1 (#264)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | 6.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | 44.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1431 | 1343 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| ProofBench | 13% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 49.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 87.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 4.5% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.0 (#66)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 34.7 (#183)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | 65.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1430 | 1338 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 12.7% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 78.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 61.4% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 40.3 (#38)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 35.2 (#77)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1266 | 1181 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.8 (#59)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 45.9 (#161)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1428 | 1318 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1467 | 1329 |
| LMArena French | 1452 | 1357 |
| LMArena German | 1454 | 1349 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1428 | 1291 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1298 |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | 1324 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1440 | 1319 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 75.0 (#77)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 73.9 (#113)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1332 |
| IFEval | — | 90.4% |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.8 (#80)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 31.8 (#270)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1344 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 44.4% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.4 (#55)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 48.8 (#193)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | 1341 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1419 | 1300 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | 1147 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1354 |
| WildBench | — | 83.8% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than GPT-4.1 mini?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 33.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GPT-4.1 mini?

GPT-4.1 mini is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GPT-4.1 mini better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 30.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GPT-4.1 mini share?

32 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4.1 mini has 47.