# Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs GLM-5.3

> GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs 2.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-5.3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite-vs-glm-5-3
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 35

## Summary

- They share 35 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5.3 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GLM-5.3 leads 62.3 to 25.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 26% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 68.8% for GLM-5.3.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper at $0.30 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $1.40 / $4.40 for GLM-5.3.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
- GLM-5.3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 54.8 |
| Rank | 133 | 26 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $1.40 |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | $4.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104)
- GLM-5.3: 59.5 (#14)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | 1622 |
| SciCode | 41.3% | 59% |
| WeirdML | 39% | 75.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | 1496 |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | 1,317 |
| DeepSWE | — | 69% |
| FrontierCode | — | 40.1% |
| CursorBench | — | 42.6% |
| FrontierSWE | — | 30.2% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107)
- GLM-5.3: 36.4 (#38)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 29.3% | 56.6% |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 8,164 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114)
- GLM-5.3: 46.1 (#46)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | 74.2% |
| CritPt | 0% | 19.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | 21% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | 1489 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | 33% |
| DTBench | 83.5% | 87.7% |
| LMCA | 37.6% | 55.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.13 | 155.61 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| Bench to the Future 3 | — | 0.15 |

## Math

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264)
- GLM-5.3: 62.3 (#33)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | 68.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | 29.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | 91.1% |
| ProofBench | 13% | 49% |
| LMArena Math | 1433 | 1489 |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72)
- GLM-5.3: 58.3 (#37)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | 90.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1435 | 1516 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 41% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40)
- GLM-5.3: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1268 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63)
- GLM-5.3: 55.7 (#28)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | 1457 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | 1528 |
| LMArena French | 1451 | 1499 |
| LMArena German | 1454 | 1499 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1427 | 1453 |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | 1472 |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | 1463 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | 1460 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85)
- GLM-5.3: 77.5 (#23)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1477 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84)
- GLM-5.3: 45.4 (#41)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1482 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57)
- GLM-5.3: 75.7 (#6)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1435 | 1471 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1420 | 1457 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | 2075 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1472 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than GLM-5.3?

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs 2.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-5.3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GLM-5.3?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; GLM-5.3 lists at $1.40 and $4.40.

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GLM-5.3 better for coding?

GLM-5.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.5 versus 42.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GLM-5.3 share?

35 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5.3 has 42.