# Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs GLM-5.3-Flash

> GLM-5.3-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.6 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite-vs-glm-5-3-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 31

## Summary

- They share 31 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5.3-Flash in 10 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GLM-5.3-Flash leads 53.1 to 25.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 26% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 55.8% for GLM-5.3-Flash.
- GLM-5.3-Flash is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.50 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
- GLM-5.3-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 49.6 |
| Rank | 113 | 45 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.15 |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | $0.50 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.1 (#96)
- GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.7 (#26)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | 1614 |
| SciCode | 41.3% | 51.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1506 |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | 303.55 |
| DeepSWE | — | 63.4% |
| FrontierCode | — | 31.8% |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 28.6 (#82)
- GLM-5.3-Flash: 34.3 (#41)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 10% | 14% |
| APEX-Agents | — | 52.8% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#95)
- GLM-5.3-Flash: 31.7 (#69)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 15.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | 14% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | 1490 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | 8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.12 | 151.9 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| DTBench | 83.5% | — |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 52.5% |
| Bench to the Future 3 | — | 0.15 |

## Math

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#245)
- GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.1 (#38)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | 55.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | 17.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | 93.9% |
| ProofBench | 13% | 21% |
| LMArena Math | 1431 | 1499 |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.0 (#66)
- GLM-5.3-Flash: 58.4 (#33)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | 90.2% |
| LMArena Expert | 1430 | 1512 |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 40.3 (#38)
- GLM-5.3-Flash: 42.6 (#25)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1266 | 1304 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.8 (#59)
- GLM-5.3-Flash: 56.2 (#24)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1428 | 1462 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1467 | 1529 |
| LMArena French | 1452 | 1495 |
| LMArena German | 1454 | 1457 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1428 | 1420 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1443 |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | 1472 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1440 | 1471 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 75.0 (#77)
- GLM-5.3-Flash: 77.8 (#17)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1480 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.8 (#80)
- GLM-5.3-Flash: 45.3 (#41)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1479 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.4 (#55)
- GLM-5.3-Flash: 65.4 (#49)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | 1471 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1419 | 1440 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1471 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than GLM-5.3-Flash?

GLM-5.3-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.6 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GLM-5.3-Flash?

GLM-5.3-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GLM-5.3-Flash better for coding?

GLM-5.3-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.7 versus 42.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GLM-5.3-Flash share?

31 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5.3-Flash has 36.