# Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs GLM-4.7

> Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GLM-4.7 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.5 vs 42.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite-vs-glm-4-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 27

## Summary

- They share 27 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 6 categories and GLM-4.7 in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GLM-4.7 leads 38.6 to 25.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 22% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 6% for GLM-4.7.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper at $0.30 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $2.20 for GLM-4.7.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 205K.
- GLM-4.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 42.0 |
| Rank | 133 | 124 |
| Context | 1.05M | 205K |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | $2.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104)
- GLM-4.7: 44.0 (#79)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | 1435 |
| SciCode | 41.3% | 45.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | 1454 |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | 399.48 |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107)
- GLM-4.7: 26.5 (#103)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 33.4% |
| APEX-Agents | 29.3% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 2,377 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114)
- GLM-4.7: 24.3 (#164)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 1.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | 6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | 1443 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.13 | 143.51 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | — | 47.7% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | — |
| DTBench | 83.5% | — |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264)
- GLM-4.7: 38.6 (#135)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | 83.3% |
| ProofBench | 13% | 6% |
| LMArena Math | 1433 | 1423 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 2.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72)
- GLM-4.7: 47.0 (#80)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | 83.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1435 | 1424 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 32.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 11.7% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40)
- GLM-4.7: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1268 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63)
- GLM-4.7: 52.8 (#79)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | 1417 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | 1495 |
| LMArena French | 1451 | 1432 |
| LMArena German | 1454 | 1424 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1427 | 1439 |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | 1399 |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | 1423 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | 1434 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85)
- GLM-4.7: 74.4 (#95)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1411 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84)
- GLM-4.7: 42.8 (#116)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1432 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.9% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 10.9% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57)
- GLM-4.7: 60.9 (#93)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1435 | 1435 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1420 | 1401 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | 1413 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1446 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than GLM-4.7?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GLM-4.7 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.5 vs 42.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GLM-4.7?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; GLM-4.7 lists at $0.60 and $2.20.

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GLM-4.7 better for coding?

GLM-4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 42.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GLM-4.7 share?

27 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.7 has 36.