# Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs GLM-4.6V

> Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GLM-4.6V score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.8 vs 40.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite-vs-glm-4-6v
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 8 categories and GLM-4.6V in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads 50.0 to 37.4.
- GLM-4.6V is cheaper at $0.30 / $0.90 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
- GLM-4.6V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 40.9 |
| Rank | 113 | 133 |
| Context | 1.05M | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | $0.90 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.1 (#96)
- GLM-4.6V: 40.2 (#128)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1390 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | — |
| SciCode | 41.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 28.6 (#82)
- GLM-4.6V: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#95)
- GLM-4.6V: 26.5 (#117)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | 1368 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | — |
| DTBench | 83.5% | — |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.12 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#245)
- GLM-4.6V: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | — |
| ProofBench | 13% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1431 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.0 (#66)
- GLM-4.6V: 37.4 (#148)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1430 | 1372 |
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 40.3 (#38)
- GLM-4.6V: 34.2 (#83)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1266 | 1164 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.8 (#59)
- GLM-4.6V: 48.8 (#135)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1428 | 1359 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1467 | 1426 |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | 1341 |
| LMArena French | 1452 | — |
| LMArena German | 1454 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1440 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 75.0 (#77)
- GLM-4.6V: 71.6 (#145)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1351 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.8 (#80)
- GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#138)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1358 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.4 (#55)
- GLM-4.6V: 56.8 (#132)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1419 | 1347 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1359 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than GLM-4.6V?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GLM-4.6V score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.8 vs 40.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GLM-4.6V?

GLM-4.6V is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GLM-4.6V better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 40.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GLM-4.6V share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.6V has 12.