# Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs GLM-4.6

> Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GLM-4.6 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.5 vs 41.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite-vs-glm-4-6
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 22

## Summary

- They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 7 categories and GLM-4.6 in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GLM-4.6 leads 39.1 to 25.9.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper at $0.30 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $2.20 for GLM-4.6.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 205K.
- GLM-4.6 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 41.4 |
| Rank | 133 | 135 |
| Context | 1.05M | 205K |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | $2.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104)
- GLM-4.6: 40.1 (#148)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | 1340 |
| SciCode | 41.3% | 38.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | 1449 |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | 340.82 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 55.4% |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107)
- GLM-4.6: 32.3 (#66)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 24.5% |
| APEX-Agents | 29.3% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 72.4% |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114)
- GLM-4.6: 23.7 (#172)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 1.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | 1440 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 47.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | — |
| DTBench | 83.5% | — |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.13 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264)
- GLM-4.6: 39.1 (#111)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1433 | 1432 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | — |
| ProofBench | 13% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 3.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72)
- GLM-4.6: 40.2 (#124)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1435 | 1431 |
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.5% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40)
- GLM-4.6: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1268 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63)
- GLM-4.6: 53.5 (#66)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | 1426 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | 1499 |
| LMArena French | 1451 | 1459 |
| LMArena German | 1454 | 1447 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1427 | 1393 |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | 1400 |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | 1419 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | 1436 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85)
- GLM-4.6: 74.3 (#98)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1410 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84)
- GLM-4.6: 43.4 (#94)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1422 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57)
- GLM-4.6: 61.1 (#90)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1435 | 1440 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1420 | 1411 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | 1411 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1427 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than GLM-4.6?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GLM-4.6 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.5 vs 41.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GLM-4.6?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; GLM-4.6 lists at $0.60 and $2.20.

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GLM-4.6 better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GLM-4.6 share?

22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.6 has 29.