# Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Gemma 4 31B IT

> Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite-vs-gemma-4-31b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 28

## Summary

- They share 28 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 4 categories and Gemma 4 31B IT in 5 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 31B IT leads 43.2 to 25.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 22% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 5% for Gemma 4 31B IT.
- Gemma 4 31B IT is cheaper at $0.09 / $0.34 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- Gemma 4 31B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Google |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 43.5 |
| Rank | 133 | 90 |
| Context | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.09 |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | $0.34 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104)
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 42.3 (#108)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | 1366 |
| SciCode | 41.3% | 43.4% |
| WeirdML | 39% | 52.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | 1459 |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | 925.5 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107)
- Gemma 4 31B IT: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 29.3% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114)
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 27.2 (#122)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | 70.6% |
| CritPt | 0% | 1.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | 5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | 1448 |
| DTBench | 83.5% | 82.7% |
| LMCA | 37.6% | 39.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.13 | 142.74 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.5% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 53% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 30.6% |

## Math

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264)
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 43.2 (#81)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | 73.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1433 | 1465 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| ProofBench | 13% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72)
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 37.9 (#151)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | 75.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1435 | 1465 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 10.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.4% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40)
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.6 (#34)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1268 | 1277 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1425 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63)
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 53.8 (#57)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | 1431 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | 1476 |
| LMArena French | 1451 | 1435 |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | 1460 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | 1444 |
| LMArena German | 1454 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85)
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 75.5 (#61)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1433 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84)
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 44.2 (#71)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1446 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57)
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 60.5 (#96)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1435 | 1443 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1420 | 1415 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | 1368 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1452 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1120 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Gemma 4 31B IT?

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Gemma 4 31B IT?

Gemma 4 31B IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.09 per million input tokens and $0.34 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.

### Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Gemma 4 31B IT better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (42.4 vs 42.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Gemma 4 31B IT share?

28 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 4 31B IT has 35.