# Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Wizardlm 13b

> Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads 71.7 to 19.4.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 56.7 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 23 | 274 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $2 | — |
| Output $/M | $12 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 42.5 (#99)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1484 | 1035 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 75.6% | — |
| DeepSWE | 11.7% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1447 | — |
| SciCode | 58.9% | — |
| GSO | 22.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 72.1% | — |
| MirrorCode | 8.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,161 | — |
| AlgoTune | 2.02 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.7 (#34)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 80.2% | — |
| APEX-Agents | 35.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 26% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 47.8% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 22% | — |
| BALROG | 57% | — |
| ExploitBench | 26.1% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 17% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1211 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 77% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,774 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.7 (#12)
- Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1485 | 1018 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 77.1% | — |
| SimpleBench | 79.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 97.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 55% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 36.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 79.4% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 14.3% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 34% | — |
| DTBench | 97.1% | — |
| LMCA | 53.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.77 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 62.1 (#34)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1485 | 1017 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 59.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 86.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 36.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 16.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.8 (#3)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.4% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 46.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 73.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1485 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.9 (#69)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1296 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 26.5% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 26.7% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 57.0 (#12)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1477 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1529 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1487 | — |
| LMArena German | 1491 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1493 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1455 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1498 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1479 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 77.0 (#32)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1466 | 1048 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 47.4 (#18)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1483 | 1054 |
| CL-bench | 20.8% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 16.9% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 66.1 (#37)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1481 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1482 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1488 | 1047 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1491 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1142 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than Wizardlm 13b?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 71 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.