# Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen3 Max

> Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 43.5 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Max costs 1.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview-vs-qwen3-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 30

## Summary

- They share 30 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3 Max in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads 71.7 to 22.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 97.4% for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and 30.1% for Qwen3 Max.
- Qwen3 Max is cheaper at $1.20 / $6 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $12 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 56.7 | 43.5 |
| Rank | 20 | 82 |
| Context | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $2 | $1.20 |
| Output $/M | $12 | $6 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 42.7 (#88)
- Qwen3 Max: 42.4 (#93)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | 1456 |
| ALE-Bench | 1,161 | 370.45 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 75.6% | — |
| DeepSWE | 11.7% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1446 | — |
| SciCode | 58.9% | — |
| GSO | 22.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 72.1% | — |
| MirrorCode | 8.9% | — |
| AlgoTune | 2.02 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.7 (#33)
- Qwen3 Max: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,774 | 71.56 |
| Terminal-Bench | 80.2% | — |
| APEX-Agents | 35.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 26% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 47.8% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 22% | — |
| BALROG | 57% | — |
| ExploitBench | 26.1% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 17% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1211 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 77% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.7 (#9)
- Qwen3 Max: 22.0 (#186)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 97.4% | 30.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | 55% | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1484 | 1448 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 34% | 5% |
| DTBench | 97.1% | 82.1% |
| LMCA | 53.8% | 28.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.92 | 142.41 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 77.1% | — |
| SimpleBench | 79.6% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.5% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 36.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 79.4% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 14.3% | — |
| ForecastBench | 59 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 61.8 (#28)
- Qwen3 Max: 37.6 (#94)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 59.6% | 18.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | 73.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1485 | 1447 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 86.5% | — |
| ProofBench | 26% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.1% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 36.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 16.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.8 (#3)
- Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#72)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.4% | 72.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 73.5% | 48.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1484 | 1457 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 46.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.4% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 38.1 (#60)
- Qwen3 Max: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1296 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 26.5% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 26.7% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 57.1 (#11)
- Qwen3 Max: 53.9 (#58)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1475 | 1429 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1528 | 1479 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | 1450 |
| LMArena German | 1491 | 1463 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1494 | 1399 |
| LMArena Korean | 1458 | 1397 |
| LMArena Russian | 1496 | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1480 | 1463 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 77.1 (#31)
- Qwen3 Max: 75.0 (#81)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1465 | 1420 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 47.3 (#17)
- Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#129)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | 20.8% | 14.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1482 | 1439 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench Life | 16.9% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 66.3 (#36)
- Qwen3 Max: 62.6 (#72)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1480 | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1482 | 1401 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1486 | 1446 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1491 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1142 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than Qwen3 Max?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 43.5 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Max costs 1.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is cheaper. It lists at $1.20 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview lists at $2 and $12.

### Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Qwen3 Max better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (42.7 vs 42.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Qwen3 Max share?

30 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 71 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.