# Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

> Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview-vs-qwen2-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads 71.7 to 24.8.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 56.7 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 20 | 179 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $2 | — |
| Output $/M | $12 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 42.7 (#88)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 37.9 (#171)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | 1314 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 75.6% | — |
| DeepSWE | 11.7% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1446 | — |
| SciCode | 58.9% | — |
| GSO | 22.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 72.1% | — |
| MirrorCode | 8.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,161 | — |
| AlgoTune | 2.02 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.7 (#33)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 80.2% | — |
| APEX-Agents | 35.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 26% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 47.8% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 22% | — |
| BALROG | 57% | — |
| ExploitBench | 26.1% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 17% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1211 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 77% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,774 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.7 (#9)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 24.8 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1484 | 1299 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 77.1% | — |
| SimpleBench | 79.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 97.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 55% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 36.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 79.4% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 14.3% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 34% | — |
| DTBench | 97.1% | — |
| LMCA | 53.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.92 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 61.8 (#28)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 33.5 (#175)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1485 | 1298 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 59.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 86.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 36.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 16.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.8 (#3)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 34.9 (#179)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1484 | 1289 |
| GPQA Diamond | 94.4% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 46.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 73.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.4% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 38.1 (#60)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1296 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 26.5% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 26.7% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 57.1 (#11)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 42.1 (#196)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1475 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1528 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1491 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1494 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1496 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1458 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1480 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 77.1 (#31)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.4 (#194)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1465 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 47.3 (#17)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#180)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1482 | 1292 |
| CL-bench | 20.8% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 16.9% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 66.3 (#36)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.5 (#186)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1480 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1482 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1486 | 1299 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1491 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1142 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 71 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.