# Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Olmo 7b Instruct

> Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview-vs-olmo-7b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads 71.7 to 18.8.
- Olmo 7b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 56.7 | 30.3 |
| Rank | 23 | 295 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $2 | — |
| Output $/M | $12 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 42.5 (#99)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1484 | 1016 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 75.6% | — |
| DeepSWE | 11.7% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1447 | — |
| SciCode | 58.9% | — |
| GSO | 22.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 72.1% | — |
| MirrorCode | 8.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,161 | — |
| AlgoTune | 2.02 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.7 (#34)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 80.2% | — |
| APEX-Agents | 35.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 26% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 47.8% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 22% | — |
| BALROG | 57% | — |
| ExploitBench | 26.1% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 17% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1211 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 77% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,774 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.7 (#12)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1485 | 993 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 77.1% | — |
| SimpleBench | 79.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 97.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 55% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 36.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 79.4% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 14.3% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 34% | — |
| DTBench | 97.1% | — |
| LMCA | 53.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.77 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 62.1 (#34)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1485 | 1018 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 59.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 86.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 36.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 16.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.8 (#3)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.4% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 46.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 73.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1485 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.9 (#69)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1296 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 26.5% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 26.7% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 57.0 (#12)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1477 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1529 | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | 1498 | 947 |
| LMArena French | 1487 | — |
| LMArena German | 1491 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1493 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1455 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1479 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 77.0 (#32)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1466 | 978 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 47.4 (#18)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | 20.8% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 16.9% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1483 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 66.1 (#37)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1481 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1482 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1488 | 1007 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1491 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1142 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than Olmo 7b Instruct?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Olmo 7b Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 71 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.