# Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Muse Glimmer

> Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview-vs-muse-glimmer
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher in 8 categories and Muse Glimmer in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads 71.7 to 27.2.
- Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 56.7 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 20 | 128 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $2 | — |
| Output $/M | $12 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 42.7 (#88)
- Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1446 | 1355 |
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | 1417 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 75.6% | — |
| DeepSWE | 11.7% | — |
| SciCode | 58.9% | — |
| GSO | 22.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 72.1% | — |
| MirrorCode | 8.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,161 | — |
| AlgoTune | 2.02 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.7 (#33)
- Muse Glimmer: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 80.2% | — |
| APEX-Agents | 35.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 26% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 47.8% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 22% | — |
| BALROG | 57% | — |
| ExploitBench | 26.1% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 17% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1211 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 77% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,774 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.7 (#9)
- Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1484 | 1395 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 77.1% | — |
| SimpleBench | 79.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 97.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 55% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 36.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 79.4% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 14.3% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 34% | — |
| DTBench | 97.1% | — |
| LMCA | 53.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.92 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 61.8 (#28)
- Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1485 | 1419 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 59.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 86.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 36.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 16.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.8 (#3)
- Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1484 | 1388 |
| GPQA Diamond | 94.4% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 46.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 73.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.4% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 38.1 (#60)
- Muse Glimmer: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1296 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 26.5% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 26.7% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 57.1 (#11)
- Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1475 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1528 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1496 | 1393 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1491 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1494 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1458 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1480 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 77.1 (#31)
- Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1465 | 1374 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 47.3 (#17)
- Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1482 | 1381 |
| CL-bench | 20.8% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 16.9% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 66.3 (#36)
- Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1480 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1482 | 1338 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1486 | 1398 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1491 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1142 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than Muse Glimmer?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Muse Glimmer share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 71 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 13.