# Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs MiniMax M1

> Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 40.3 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax M1 costs 4.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview-vs-minimax-m1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher in 8 categories and MiniMax M1 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads 71.7 to 26.9.
- MiniMax M1 is cheaper at $0.55 / $2.20 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $12 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
- MiniMax M1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 56.7 | 40.3 |
| Rank | 23 | 150 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $2 | $0.55 |
| Output $/M | $12 | $2.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 42.5 (#99)
- MiniMax M1: 39.9 (#153)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1484 | 1359 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 75.6% | — |
| DeepSWE | 11.7% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1447 | — |
| SciCode | 58.9% | — |
| GSO | 22.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 72.1% | — |
| MirrorCode | 8.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,161 | — |
| AlgoTune | 2.02 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.7 (#34)
- MiniMax M1: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 80.2% | — |
| APEX-Agents | 35.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 26% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 47.8% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 22% | — |
| BALROG | 57% | — |
| ExploitBench | 26.1% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 17% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1211 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 77% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,774 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.7 (#12)
- MiniMax M1: 26.9 (#126)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1485 | 1339 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 77.1% | — |
| SimpleBench | 79.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 97.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 55% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 36.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 79.4% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 14.3% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 34% | — |
| DTBench | 97.1% | — |
| LMCA | 53.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.77 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 62.1 (#34)
- MiniMax M1: 37.5 (#151)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1485 | 1361 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 59.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 86.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 36.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 16.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.8 (#3)
- MiniMax M1: 36.4 (#170)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1485 | 1317 |
| GPQA Diamond | 94.4% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 46.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 73.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.4% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.9 (#69)
- MiniMax M1: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1296 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 26.5% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 26.7% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 57.0 (#12)
- MiniMax M1: 45.8 (#163)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1477 | 1319 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1529 | 1360 |
| LMArena French | 1487 | 1370 |
| LMArena German | 1491 | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1493 | 1217 |
| LMArena Korean | 1455 | 1266 |
| LMArena Russian | 1498 | 1329 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1479 | 1353 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 77.0 (#32)
- MiniMax M1: 69.3 (#174)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1466 | 1312 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 47.4 (#18)
- MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#141)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1483 | 1326 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 69.4% |
| CL-bench | 20.8% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 16.9% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 66.1 (#37)
- MiniMax M1: 53.1 (#161)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1481 | 1343 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1482 | 1298 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1488 | 1335 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1491 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1142 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than MiniMax M1?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 40.3 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax M1 costs 4.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or MiniMax M1?

MiniMax M1 is cheaper. It lists at $0.55 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview lists at $2 and $12.

### Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or MiniMax M1 better for coding?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 39.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and MiniMax M1 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 71 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax M1 has 18.