# Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10

> Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 38.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview-vs-hunyuan-large
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads 71.7 to 24.5.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 56.7 | 38.0 |
| Rank | 20 | 183 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $2 | — |
| Output $/M | $12 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 42.7 (#88)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 37.6 (#177)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | 1307 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 75.6% | — |
| DeepSWE | 11.7% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1446 | — |
| SciCode | 58.9% | — |
| GSO | 22.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 72.1% | — |
| MirrorCode | 8.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,161 | — |
| AlgoTune | 2.02 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.7 (#33)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 80.2% | — |
| APEX-Agents | 35.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 26% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 47.8% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 22% | — |
| BALROG | 57% | — |
| ExploitBench | 26.1% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 17% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1211 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 77% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,774 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.7 (#9)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 24.5 (#147)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1484 | 1286 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 77.1% | — |
| SimpleBench | 79.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 97.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 55% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 36.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 79.4% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 14.3% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 34% | — |
| DTBench | 97.1% | — |
| LMCA | 53.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.92 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 61.8 (#28)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 33.1 (#178)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1485 | 1281 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 59.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 86.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 36.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 16.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.8 (#3)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 34.5 (#188)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1484 | 1276 |
| GPQA Diamond | 94.4% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 46.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 73.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.4% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 38.1 (#60)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1296 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 26.5% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 26.7% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 57.1 (#11)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.1 (#195)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1475 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1528 | 1346 |
| LMArena Russian | 1496 | 1266 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1491 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1494 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1458 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1480 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 77.1 (#31)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.6 (#192)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1465 | 1277 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 47.3 (#17)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#144)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1482 | 1342 |
| CL-bench | 20.8% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 16.9% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 66.3 (#36)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.9 (#191)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1480 | 1288 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1482 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1486 | 1284 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1491 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1142 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 38.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 71 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.