# Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

> Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.4 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-vs-qwen3-coder-480b-a35b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 21

## Summary

- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads 29.9 to 23.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 67.2% for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and 49.5% for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is cheaper at $0.25 / $1.50 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.4 | 37.7 |
| Rank | 141 | 186 |
| Context | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.25 | $1.50 |
| Output $/M | $1.50 | $7.50 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.5 (#179)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.2 (#199)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1256 | 1275 |
| WeirdML | 52.2% | 41.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1400 | 1413 |
| ALE-Bench | 797.73 | 461.45 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 55.4% |
| SciCode | 41.9% | — |
| GSO | — | 4.9% |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.44 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 29.9 (#72)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.7 (#116)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 27.2% |
| DeepResearch Bench | 37.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.3 (#181)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 24.7 (#141)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 67.2% | 49.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1407 | 1372 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 8.2% | — |
| CritPt | 1.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 25% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 63.3% | — |
| DTBench | 76.8% | — |
| LMCA | 35% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.45 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.4 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.5 (#82)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 34.9 (#151)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1427 | 1364 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 27.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 80% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.7 (#95)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.4 (#159)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1397 | 1337 |
| GPQA Diamond | 81.8% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 38.7 (#57)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1240 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.5 (#82)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.8 (#143)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1410 | 1345 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1461 | 1356 |
| LMArena French | 1423 | 1394 |
| LMArena German | 1429 | 1324 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1411 | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | 1393 | 1307 |
| LMArena Russian | 1420 | 1367 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | 1360 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.9 (#126)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.8 (#142)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1376 | 1356 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#117)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#126)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1394 | 1379 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 61.0 (#90)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.5 (#142)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1416 | 1356 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | 1333 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1417 | 1365 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.4 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct lists at $1.50 and $7.50.

### Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.5 versus 36.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.