# Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen3.5-Flash

> Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-vs-qwen3-5-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 27

## Summary

- They share 27 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen3.5-Flash in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.5-Flash leads 33.7 to 22.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 27.7% for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and 18.2% for Qwen3.5-Flash.
- Qwen3.5-Flash is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $1.50 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.8 | 42.5 |
| Rank | 144 | 112 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.25 | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | $1.50 | $0.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.8 (#188)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 34.2 (#242)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1256 | 1244 |
| LMArena Coding | 1400 | 1412 |
| ALE-Bench | 797.73 | 221.8 |
| SciCode | 41.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 52.2% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 30.2 (#79)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| DeepResearch Bench | 37.3% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 462.69 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.9 (#186)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 33.7 (#72)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 25% | 21% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1407 | 1403 |
| DTBench | 76.8% | 82.9% |
| LMCA | 35% | 29.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.47 | 143.98 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 67.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 8.2% | — |
| CritPt | 1.1% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 63.3% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 20% |
| ForecastBench | 54.4 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 40.7 (#90)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 37.4 (#158)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 27.7% | 18.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 80% | 84.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1428 | 1407 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 6.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.9 (#104)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 43.2 (#93)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 81.8% | 82.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.2% | 10.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1398 | 1407 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 20.3% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.4 (#60)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1240 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.3 (#86)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 50.5 (#121)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1411 | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1461 | 1446 |
| LMArena French | 1424 | 1412 |
| LMArena German | 1429 | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1413 | 1368 |
| LMArena Korean | 1392 | 1344 |
| LMArena Russian | 1420 | 1379 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1421 | 1400 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.7 (#131)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 72.6 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1377 | 1374 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#122)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 42.4 (#124)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1394 | 1392 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 60.9 (#94)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 57.9 (#122)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1416 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | 1343 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1417 | 1393 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than Qwen3.5-Flash?

Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Qwen3.5-Flash?

Qwen3.5-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite lists at $0.25 and $1.50.

### Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Qwen3.5-Flash better for coding?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Qwen3.5-Flash share?

27 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-Flash has 32.