# Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen1.5-32B

> Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-vs-qwen1-5-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-32B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads 41.9 to 13.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 81.8% for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and 30.7% for Qwen1.5-32B.
- Qwen1.5-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.8 | 30.5 |
| Rank | 144 | 293 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.50 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.8 (#188)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1400 | 1155 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1256 | — |
| SciCode | 41.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 52.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.3% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 42% |
| ALE-Bench | 797.73 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 30.2 (#79)
- Qwen1.5-32B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| DeepResearch Bench | 37.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.9 (#186)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1407 | 1130 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 67.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 8.2% | — |
| CritPt | 1.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 25% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 63.3% | — |
| DTBench | 76.8% | — |
| LMCA | 35% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.47 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.4 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 40.7 (#90)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1428 | 1155 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 27.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 80% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.9 (#104)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 81.8% | 30.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1398 | 1126 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.2% | — |
| MMLU | — | 74.4% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.4 (#60)
- Qwen1.5-32B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1240 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.3 (#86)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1411 | 1106 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1461 | 1177 |
| LMArena French | 1424 | 1101 |
| LMArena German | 1429 | 1058 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1413 | 1027 |
| LMArena Korean | 1392 | 1008 |
| LMArena Russian | 1420 | 1073 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1421 | 1089 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.7 (#131)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1377 | 1116 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#122)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1394 | 1146 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 60.9 (#94)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1416 | 1137 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1417 | 1140 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than Qwen1.5-32B?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Qwen1.5-32B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.