# Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen Plus

> Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.4 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen Plus in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads 39.5 to 22.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 80% for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and 17.8% for Qwen Plus.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is cheaper at $0.25 / $1.50 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.20 for Qwen Plus.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.4 | 36.7 |
| Rank | 141 | 204 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.25 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $1.50 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.5 (#179)
- Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1400 | 1328 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1256 | — |
| SciCode | 41.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 52.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 797.73 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 29.9 (#72)
- Qwen Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| DeepResearch Bench | 37.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.3 (#181)
- Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 67.2% | 63.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1407 | 1317 |
| DTBench | 76.8% | 81.1% |
| LMCA | 35% | 24% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 8.2% | — |
| CritPt | 1.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 25% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 63.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.45 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.4 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.5 (#82)
- Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 80% | 17.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1427 | 1326 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 27.7% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.7 (#95)
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 81.8% | 48.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1397 | 1328 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 38.7 (#57)
- Qwen Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1240 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.5 (#82)
- Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1410 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1461 | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1411 | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | 1420 | 1323 |
| LMArena French | 1423 | — |
| LMArena German | 1429 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1393 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.9 (#126)
- Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1376 | 1303 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#117)
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1394 | 1325 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 61.0 (#90)
- Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1416 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1417 | 1336 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than Qwen Plus?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.4 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Qwen Plus?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Qwen Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.20.

### Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Qwen Plus better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (37.5 vs 38.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Qwen Plus share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.