# Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen Max

> Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-vs-qwen-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen Max in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads 40.7 to 22.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 80% for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and 16.1% for Qwen Max.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is cheaper at $0.25 / $1.50 per million input/output tokens, against $1.60 / $6.40 for Qwen Max.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 33K.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.8 | 34.7 |
| Rank | 144 | 230 |
| Context | 1.05M | 33K |
| Input $/M | $0.25 | $1.60 |
| Output $/M | $1.50 | $6.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.8 (#188)
- Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1400 | 1288 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1256 | — |
| SciCode | 41.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 52.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 797.73 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 30.2 (#79)
- Qwen Max: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| DeepResearch Bench | 37.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.9 (#186)
- Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1407 | 1269 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 67.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 8.2% | — |
| CritPt | 1.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 25% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 63.3% | — |
| DTBench | 76.8% | — |
| LMCA | 35% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.47 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.4 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 40.7 (#90)
- Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 80% | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1428 | 1275 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 27.7% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.9 (#104)
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 81.8% | 56.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1398 | 1248 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.4 (#60)
- Qwen Max: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1240 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.3 (#86)
- Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1411 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1461 | 1254 |
| LMArena French | 1424 | 1330 |
| LMArena German | 1429 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1413 | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | 1392 | 1142 |
| LMArena Russian | 1420 | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1421 | 1290 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.7 (#131)
- Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1377 | 1262 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#122)
- Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1394 | 1288 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 60.9 (#94)
- Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1416 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1417 | 1277 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than Qwen Max?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Qwen Max?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Qwen Max lists at $1.60 and $6.40.

### Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Qwen Max better for coding?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 33K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Qwen Max share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.