# Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Mistral Nemo

> Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.4 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 3.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-vs-mistral-nemo
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 5 categories and Mistral Nemo in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads 61.0 to 28.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 81.8% for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and 29.9% for Mistral Nemo.
- Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $1.50 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
- Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 40.4 | 25.9 |
| Rank | 141 | 332 |
| Context | 1.05M | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.25 | $0.15 |
| Output $/M | $1.50 | $0.15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.5 (#179)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1256 | — |
| SciCode | 41.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 52.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1400 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 797.73 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 29.9 (#72)
- Mistral Nemo: 23.3 (#118)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| DeepResearch Bench | 37.3% | — |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.3 (#181)
- Mistral Nemo: 19.9 (#230)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 76.8% | 48.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.45 | 118.63 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 67.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 8.2% | — |
| CritPt | 1.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 25% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 63.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1407 | — |
| LMCA | 35% | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.4 | — |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |

## Math

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.5 (#82)
- Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#263)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 27.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 80% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1427 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10.8% |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.7 (#95)
- Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#293)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 81.8% | 29.9% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1397 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 38.7 (#57)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1240 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.5 (#82)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1410 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1461 | — |
| LMArena French | 1423 | — |
| LMArena German | 1429 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1393 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.9 (#126)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1376 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#117)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1394 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 61.0 (#90)
- Mistral Nemo: 28.6 (#291)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 881 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1417 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than Mistral Nemo?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.4 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 3.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Mistral Nemo?

Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite lists at $0.25 and $1.50.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Mistral Nemo share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.