# Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs MiMo-V2-Pro

> MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-vs-mimo-v2-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 21

## Summary

- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 4 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 43.8 to 37.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 8.2% for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and 25.8% for MiMo-V2-Pro.
- Both cost about the same: $0.25 input and $1.50 output per million tokens.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 40.8 | 43.0 |
| Rank | 144 | 103 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.25 | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | $1.50 | $0.87 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.8 (#188)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1256 | 1433 |
| LMArena Coding | 1400 | 1476 |
| ALE-Bench | 797.73 | 785.17 |
| SciCode | 41.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 52.2% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 30.2 (#79)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| DeepResearch Bench | 37.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.9 (#186)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 8.2% | 25.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | 63.3% | 45.9% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1407 | 1457 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 67.2% | — |
| CritPt | 1.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 25% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 3% | — |
| DTBench | 76.8% | — |
| LMCA | 35% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.47 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.4 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 40.7 (#90)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1428 | 1447 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 27.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 80% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.9 (#104)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1398 | 1478 |
| GPQA Diamond | 81.8% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.4 (#60)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1240 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.3 (#86)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1411 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1461 | 1456 |
| LMArena French | 1424 | 1469 |
| LMArena German | 1429 | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1413 | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | 1392 | 1400 |
| LMArena Russian | 1420 | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1421 | 1457 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.7 (#131)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1377 | 1445 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#122)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1394 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 60.9 (#94)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1416 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1417 | 1456 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite lists at $0.25 and $1.50.

### Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1.05M tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.