# Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Llama 3-70B

> Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-vs-llama-3-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 23

## Summary

- They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 9 categories and Llama 3-70B in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads 40.7 to 12.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 80% for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and 4.3% for Llama 3-70B.
- Llama 3-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 40.8 | 28.8 |
| Rank | 144 | 323 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.50 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.8 (#188)
- Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1400 | 1206 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1256 | — |
| SciCode | 41.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 52.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 43.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.5% |
| ALE-Bench | 797.73 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 72% |
| MBPP+ | — | 69% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 30.2 (#79)
- Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 5% |
| DeepResearch Bench | 37.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.9 (#186)
- Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 67.2% | 35.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1407 | 1195 |
| DTBench | 76.8% | 54.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.47 | 122.93 |
| ForecastBench | 54.4 | 57.1 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 8.2% | — |
| CritPt | 1.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 25% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 63.3% | — |
| LMCA | 35% | — |
| WinoGrande | — | 83.5% |

## Math

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 40.7 (#90)
- Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 80% | 4.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1428 | 1218 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 27.7% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 22.6% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.9 (#104)
- Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 81.8% | 40.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1398 | 1149 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.2% | — |
| MMLU | — | 79.3% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.4 (#60)
- Llama 3-70B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1240 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.3 (#86)
- Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1411 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1461 | 1114 |
| LMArena French | 1424 | 1232 |
| LMArena German | 1429 | 1169 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1413 | 1017 |
| LMArena Korean | 1392 | 1017 |
| LMArena Russian | 1420 | 1159 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1421 | 1241 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.7 (#131)
- Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1377 | 1194 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#122)
- Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1394 | 1174 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 60.9 (#94)
- Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1416 | 1221 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | 1210 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1417 | 1223 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than Llama 3-70B?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Llama 3-70B better for coding?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Llama 3-70B share?

23 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.