# Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Kimi K2.7 Code

> Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 40.4 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs 3.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.7 Code's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-vs-kimi-k2-7-code
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 1 category and Kimi K2.7 Code in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 38.2 to 22.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 27.7% for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and 54% for Kimi K2.7 Code.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is cheaper at $0.25 / $1.50 per million input/output tokens, against $0.95 / $4 for Kimi K2.7 Code.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- Kimi K2.7 Code has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 40.4 | 43.0 |
| Rank | 141 | 90 |
| Context | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.25 | $0.95 |
| Output $/M | $1.50 | $4 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.5 (#179)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.4 (#92)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1256 | 1473 |
| SciCode | 41.9% | 47.5% |
| WeirdML | 52.2% | 54.1% |
| ALE-Bench | 797.73 | 886.23 |
| DeepSWE | — | 30.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 30.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1400 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 29.9 (#72)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 23.9 (#115)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.6% |
| DeepResearch Bench | 37.3% | — |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,083 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.3 (#181)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 38.2 (#56)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 1.1% | 10% |
| Chess Puzzles | 25% | 21% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.45 | 150.01 |
| SimpleBench | — | 57.9% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 67.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 8.2% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 63.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1407 | — |
| DTBench | 76.8% | — |
| LMCA | 35% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 48.8% |
| ForecastBench | 54.4 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.5 (#82)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.6 (#39)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 27.7% | 54% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 80% | 95.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 12.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1427 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.7 (#95)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.6 (#51)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 81.8% | 87.9% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 36.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1397 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 38.7 (#57)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1240 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.5 (#82)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1410 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1461 | — |
| LMArena French | 1423 | — |
| LMArena German | 1429 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1393 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.9 (#126)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1376 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#117)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1394 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 61.0 (#90)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1417 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 40.4 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs 3.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.7 Code's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Kimi K2.7 Code?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code lists at $0.95 and $4.

### Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 37.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.