# Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs GPT-5 Pro

> GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 40.4 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs 73× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-vs-gpt-5-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5 Pro in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5 Pro leads 39.2 to 22.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 27.7% for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and 55.8% for GPT-5 Pro.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is cheaper at $0.25 / $1.50 per million input/output tokens, against $15 / $120 for GPT-5 Pro.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 400K.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 40.4 | 46.2 |
| Rank | 141 | 58 |
| Context | 1.05M | 400K |
| Input $/M | $0.25 | $15 |
| Output $/M | $1.50 | $120 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.5 (#179)
- GPT-5 Pro: 43.4 (#77)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 52.2% | 60.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1256 | — |
| SciCode | 41.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1400 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 797.73 | — |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.31 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 29.9 (#72)
- GPT-5 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| DeepResearch Bench | 37.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.3 (#181)
- GPT-5 Pro: 39.2 (#52)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 67.2% | 76.8% |
| EnigmaEval | 3% | 18.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.45 | 150.26 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 18.3% |
| SimpleBench | — | 61.6% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 8.2% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 70.2% |
| CritPt | 1.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 25% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 63.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1407 | — |
| DTBench | 76.8% | — |
| LMCA | 35% | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.4 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.5 (#82)
- GPT-5 Pro: 48.0 (#53)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 27.7% | 55.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 19.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 80% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1427 | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 14.6% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.7 (#95)
- GPT-5 Pro: 56.2 (#39)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.6% | 31.6% |
| GPQA Diamond | 81.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1397 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 38.7 (#57)
- GPT-5 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1240 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.5 (#82)
- GPT-5 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1410 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1461 | — |
| LMArena French | 1423 | — |
| LMArena German | 1429 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1393 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.9 (#126)
- GPT-5 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1376 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#117)
- GPT-5 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1394 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 61.0 (#90)
- GPT-5 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1417 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than GPT-5 Pro?

GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 40.4 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs 73× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or GPT-5 Pro?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; GPT-5 Pro lists at $15 and $120.

### Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or GPT-5 Pro better for coding?

GPT-5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 37.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and GPT-5 Pro share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5 Pro has 12.