# Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs GLM-4.7

> GLM-4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 40.4 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs 1.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-vs-glm-4-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 26

## Summary

- They share 26 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 2 categories and GLM-4.7 in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where GLM-4.7 leads 43.6 to 37.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 25% for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and 6% for GLM-4.7.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is cheaper at $0.25 / $1.50 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $2.20 for GLM-4.7.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 205K.
- GLM-4.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 40.4 | 41.7 |
| Rank | 141 | 117 |
| Context | 1.05M | 205K |
| Input $/M | $0.25 | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | $1.50 | $2.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.5 (#179)
- GLM-4.7: 43.6 (#74)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1256 | 1435 |
| SciCode | 41.9% | 45.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1400 | 1454 |
| ALE-Bench | 797.73 | 399.48 |
| WeirdML | 52.2% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 29.9 (#72)
- GLM-4.7: 26.4 (#96)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 33.4% |
| DeepResearch Bench | 37.3% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 2,377 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.3 (#181)
- GLM-4.7: 23.7 (#161)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 1.1% | 1.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | 25% | 6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1407 | 1443 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.45 | 143.53 |
| SimpleBench | — | 47.7% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 67.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 8.2% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 63.3% | — |
| DTBench | 76.8% | — |
| LMCA | 35% | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.4 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.5 (#82)
- GLM-4.7: 37.7 (#92)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 80% | 83.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1427 | 1423 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 27.7% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 6% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 2.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.7 (#95)
- GLM-4.7: 47.0 (#74)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 81.8% | 83.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.2% | 11.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1397 | 1424 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 32.2% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 38.7 (#57)
- GLM-4.7: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1240 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.5 (#82)
- GLM-4.7: 53.0 (#75)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1410 | 1417 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1461 | 1495 |
| LMArena French | 1423 | 1432 |
| LMArena German | 1429 | 1426 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1411 | 1439 |
| LMArena Korean | 1393 | 1401 |
| LMArena Russian | 1420 | 1423 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | 1433 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.9 (#126)
- GLM-4.7: 74.6 (#90)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1376 | 1411 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#117)
- GLM-4.7: 42.8 (#111)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1394 | 1432 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.9% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 10.9% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 61.0 (#90)
- GLM-4.7: 61.1 (#89)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1416 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | 1401 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1417 | 1446 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1413 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than GLM-4.7?

GLM-4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 40.4 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs 1.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or GLM-4.7?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; GLM-4.7 lists at $0.60 and $2.20.

### Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or GLM-4.7 better for coding?

GLM-4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 37.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and GLM-4.7 share?

26 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.7 has 36.