# Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs GLM-4.6V

> Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and GLM-4.6V score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.8 vs 41.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-vs-glm-4-6v
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 6 categories and GLM-4.6V in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-4.6V leads 27.6 to 22.9.
- GLM-4.6V is cheaper at $0.30 / $0.90 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $1.50 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
- GLM-4.6V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 40.8 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 144 | 137 |
| Context | 1.05M | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.25 | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | $1.50 | $0.90 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.8 (#188)
- GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1400 | 1390 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1256 | — |
| SciCode | 41.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 52.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 797.73 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 30.2 (#79)
- GLM-4.6V: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| DeepResearch Bench | 37.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.9 (#186)
- GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1407 | 1368 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 67.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 8.2% | — |
| CritPt | 1.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 25% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 63.3% | — |
| DTBench | 76.8% | — |
| LMCA | 35% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.47 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.4 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 40.7 (#90)
- GLM-4.6V: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 27.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 80% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1428 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.9 (#104)
- GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1398 | 1371 |
| GPQA Diamond | 81.8% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.4 (#60)
- GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1240 | 1164 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.3 (#86)
- GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1411 | 1359 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1461 | 1425 |
| LMArena Russian | 1420 | 1340 |
| LMArena French | 1424 | — |
| LMArena German | 1429 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1413 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1421 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.7 (#131)
- GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1377 | 1352 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#122)
- GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1394 | 1358 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 60.9 (#94)
- GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1416 | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | 1347 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1417 | 1360 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than GLM-4.6V?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and GLM-4.6V score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.8 vs 41.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or GLM-4.6V?

GLM-4.6V is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite lists at $0.25 and $1.50.

### Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or GLM-4.6V better for coding?

GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and GLM-4.6V share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.6V has 12.