# Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs GLM-4.6

> Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and GLM-4.6 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.4 vs 40.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-vs-glm-4-6
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 23

## Summary

- They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 2 categories and GLM-4.6 in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads 39.5 to 36.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 67.2% for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and 47.4% for GLM-4.6.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is cheaper at $0.25 / $1.50 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $2.20 for GLM-4.6.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 205K.
- GLM-4.6 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 40.4 | 40.9 |
| Rank | 141 | 132 |
| Context | 1.05M | 205K |
| Input $/M | $0.25 | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | $1.50 | $2.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.5 (#179)
- GLM-4.6: 39.9 (#137)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1256 | 1339 |
| SciCode | 41.9% | 38.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1400 | 1449 |
| ALE-Bench | 797.73 | 340.82 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 55.4% |
| WeirdML | 52.2% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 29.9 (#72)
- GLM-4.6: 32.1 (#60)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 24.5% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 72.4% |
| DeepResearch Bench | 37.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.3 (#181)
- GLM-4.6: 23.1 (#168)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 67.2% | 47.4% |
| CritPt | 1.1% | 1.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1407 | 1440 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 8.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 25% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 63.3% | — |
| DTBench | 76.8% | — |
| LMCA | 35% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.45 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.4 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.5 (#82)
- GLM-4.6: 36.4 (#115)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1427 | 1431 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 27.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 80% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 3.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.7 (#95)
- GLM-4.6: 39.6 (#118)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.2% | 9.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1397 | 1432 |
| GPQA Diamond | 81.8% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.6% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 38.7 (#57)
- GLM-4.6: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1240 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.5 (#82)
- GLM-4.6: 53.6 (#62)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1410 | 1426 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1461 | 1500 |
| LMArena French | 1423 | 1459 |
| LMArena German | 1429 | 1447 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1411 | 1394 |
| LMArena Korean | 1393 | 1401 |
| LMArena Russian | 1420 | 1418 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | 1436 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.9 (#126)
- GLM-4.6: 74.5 (#93)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1376 | 1410 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#117)
- GLM-4.6: 43.4 (#91)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1394 | 1423 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 61.0 (#90)
- GLM-4.6: 61.3 (#86)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1416 | 1440 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | 1411 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1417 | 1427 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1411 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than GLM-4.6?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and GLM-4.6 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.4 vs 40.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or GLM-4.6?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; GLM-4.6 lists at $0.60 and $2.20.

### Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or GLM-4.6 better for coding?

GLM-4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 37.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and GLM-4.6 share?

23 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.6 has 29.