# Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Wizardlm 70b

> Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-wizardlm-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 63.7 to 34.8.
- Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 45.0 | 33.0 |
| Rank | 75 | 249 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $1.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.4 (#101)
- Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1452 | 1081 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 57.6% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 53.6% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 83.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1227 | — |
| SciCode | 42.8% | — |
| GSO | 3.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 54% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 85.9% | — |
| CadEval | 64% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.52 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.51 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.2 (#88)
- Wizardlm 70b: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 32.6% | — |
| GDPval | 23.3% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 0.8% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 30.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 13.7% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 42.8% | — |
| BALROG | 43.3% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1142 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 55.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 573.64 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#99)
- Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1455 | 1079 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 62.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 70.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 41% | — |
| CritPt | 2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 5.6% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 89.8% | — |
| DTBench | 82.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 79.9% | — |
| LMCA | 34.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.32 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.3 | — |
| LiveBench | 82.3% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 32.5 (#213)
- Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1450 | 1116 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 24.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 84.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 41.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 90.2% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 95.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 14.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 56.0 (#46)
- Wizardlm 70b: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 85.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 21.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 86.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 10.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 74.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 45.2 (#18)
- Wizardlm 70b: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1263 | — |
| GeoBench | 86% | — |
| VPCT | 48% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1421 | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 44.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.3 (#31)
- Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1451 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1052 |
| LMArena German | 1487 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1461 | 1155 |
| LMArena French | 1472 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1461 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.0 (#75)
- Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1437 | 1093 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 80.6% | — |
| IFEval | 84% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.8 (#5)
- Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1449 | 1097 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 91.7% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.7 (#62)
- Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1458 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1454 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1453 | 1108 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 83.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1421 | — |
| WildBench | 85.7% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 67.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.5 Pro better than Wizardlm 70b?

Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Pro and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.