# Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Wizardlm 13b

> Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 63.7 to 30.5.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 45.0 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 75 | 274 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $1.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.4 (#101)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1452 | 1035 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 57.6% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 53.6% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 83.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1227 | — |
| SciCode | 42.8% | — |
| GSO | 3.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 54% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 85.9% | — |
| CadEval | 64% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.52 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.51 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.2 (#88)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 32.6% | — |
| GDPval | 23.3% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 0.8% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 30.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 13.7% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 42.8% | — |
| BALROG | 43.3% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1142 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 55.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 573.64 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#99)
- Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1455 | 1018 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 62.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 70.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 41% | — |
| CritPt | 2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 5.6% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 89.8% | — |
| DTBench | 82.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 79.9% | — |
| LMCA | 34.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.32 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.3 | — |
| LiveBench | 82.3% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 32.5 (#213)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1450 | 1017 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 24.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 84.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 41.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 90.2% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 95.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 14.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 56.0 (#46)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 85.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 21.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 86.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 10.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 74.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 45.2 (#18)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1263 | — |
| GeoBench | 86% | — |
| VPCT | 48% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1421 | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 44.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.3 (#31)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1451 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1472 | — |
| LMArena German | 1487 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1461 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1461 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.0 (#75)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1437 | 1048 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 80.6% | — |
| IFEval | 84% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.8 (#5)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1449 | 1054 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 91.7% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.7 (#62)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1458 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1454 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1453 | 1047 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 83.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1421 | — |
| WildBench | 85.7% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 67.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.5 Pro better than Wizardlm 13b?

Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Pro and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.