# Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen3.7 Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (45.0 vs 45.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 28

## Summary

- They share 28 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 50.5 to 32.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 24.6% for Gemini 2.5 Pro and 34.4% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $10 for Gemini 2.5 Pro.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 45.0 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 75 | 72 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $1.25 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $1.60 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.4 (#101)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 42.8% | 45.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1452 | 1473 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 57.6% | — |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 53.6% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 83.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1227 | — |
| GSO | 3.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 54% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 85.9% | — |
| CadEval | 64% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.52 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.51 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.2 (#88)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 32.6% | — |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |
| GDPval | 23.3% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 0.8% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 30.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 13.7% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 42.8% | — |
| BALROG | 43.3% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1142 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 55.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 573.64 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#99)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 2% | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | 24% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1455 | 1460 |
| DTBench | 82.4% | 84% |
| LMCA | 34.8% | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.32 | 147.37 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 62.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 70.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 41% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 5.6% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 89.8% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 79.9% | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.3 | — |
| LiveBench | 82.3% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 32.5 (#213)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 24.6% | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 84.7% | 93.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1450 | 1466 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 41.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 90.2% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 95.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 14.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 56.0 (#46)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 85.3% | 87.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | 1467 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 21.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 86.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 10.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 74.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 45.2 (#18)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1263 | 1279 |
| LMArena Document | 1421 | 1444 |
| GeoBench | 86% | — |
| VPCT | 48% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 44.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.3 (#31)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1451 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1510 |
| LMArena French | 1472 | 1473 |
| LMArena German | 1487 | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1461 | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | 1434 | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | 1461 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1457 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.0 (#75)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1437 | 1440 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 80.6% | — |
| IFEval | 84% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.8 (#5)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1449 | 1455 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 91.7% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.7 (#62)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1458 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1454 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1453 | 1460 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 83.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1421 | — |
| WildBench | 85.7% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 67.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.5 Pro better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen3.7 Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (45.0 vs 45.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; Gemini 2.5 Pro lists at $1.25 and $10.

### Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 2.5 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

28 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.