# Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

> Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen3.5 Max Preview score almost the same on the Noometry Index (44.9 vs 44.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-qwen3-5-max-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 6 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 55.8 to 41.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 44.9 | 44.7 |
| Rank | 67 | 72 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $1.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.8 (#86)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 43.4 (#79)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1452 | 1488 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 57.6% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 53.6% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 83.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1227 | — |
| SciCode | 42.8% | — |
| GSO | 3.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 54% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 85.9% | — |
| CadEval | 64% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.52 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.51 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.1 (#81)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 32.6% | — |
| GDPval | 23.3% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 0.8% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 30.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 13.7% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 42.8% | — |
| BALROG | 43.3% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1142 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 55.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 573.64 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#85)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 29.6 (#81)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1455 | 1483 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 62.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 70.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 41% | — |
| CritPt | 2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 5.6% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 89.8% | — |
| DTBench | 82.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 79.9% | — |
| LMCA | 34.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.32 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.3 | — |
| LiveBench | 82.3% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 31.9 (#191)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 37.3 (#99)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1450 | 1473 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 24.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 84.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 41.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 90.2% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 95.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 14.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.8 (#41)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.1 (#104)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | 1489 |
| GPQA Diamond | 85.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 21.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 86.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 10.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 74.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 44.5 (#16)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1263 | — |
| GeoBench | 86% | — |
| VPCT | 48% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1421 | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 44.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.5 (#30)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.4 (#21)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1452 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1534 |
| LMArena French | 1473 | 1483 |
| LMArena German | 1487 | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1462 | 1497 |
| LMArena Korean | 1435 | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | 1460 | 1472 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1470 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.2 (#71)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.2 (#28)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1436 | 1467 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 80.6% | — |
| IFEval | 84% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.7 (#5)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#44)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1449 | 1477 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 91.7% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.9 (#60)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.1 (#39)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1458 | 1471 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1453 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1453 | 1478 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 83.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1421 | — |
| WildBench | 85.7% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 67.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.5 Pro better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen3.5 Max Preview score almost the same on the Noometry Index (44.9 vs 44.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (42.8 vs 43.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.