# Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Olmo 7b Instruct

> Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.9 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-olmo-7b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 63.9 to 26.0.
- Olmo 7b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 44.9 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 67 | 293 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $1.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.8 (#86)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.1 (#298)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1452 | 1016 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 57.6% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 53.6% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 83.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1227 | — |
| SciCode | 42.8% | — |
| GSO | 3.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 54% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 85.9% | — |
| CadEval | 64% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.52 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.51 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.1 (#81)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 32.6% | — |
| GDPval | 23.3% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 0.8% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 30.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 13.7% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 42.8% | — |
| BALROG | 43.3% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1142 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 55.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 573.64 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#85)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.0 (#273)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1455 | 993 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 62.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 70.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 41% | — |
| CritPt | 2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 5.6% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 89.8% | — |
| DTBench | 82.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 79.9% | — |
| LMCA | 34.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.32 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.3 | — |
| LiveBench | 82.3% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 31.9 (#191)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 27.8 (#234)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1450 | 1018 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 24.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 84.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 41.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 90.2% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 95.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 14.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.8 (#41)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 85.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 21.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 86.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 10.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 74.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 44.5 (#16)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1263 | — |
| GeoBench | 86% | — |
| VPCT | 48% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1421 | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 44.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.5 (#30)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.1 (#286)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1452 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1013 |
| LMArena Russian | 1460 | 946 |
| LMArena French | 1473 | — |
| LMArena German | 1487 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1462 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1435 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.2 (#71)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.3 (#296)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1436 | 978 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 80.6% | — |
| IFEval | 84% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.7 (#5)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 91.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1449 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.9 (#60)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 26.0 (#298)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1458 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1453 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1453 | 1007 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 83.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1421 | — |
| WildBench | 85.7% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 67.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.5 Pro better than Olmo 7b Instruct?

Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.9 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?

Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.8 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Pro and Olmo 7b Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.