# Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.2

> Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.8 to 44.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-muse-spark-1-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 21

## Summary

- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Muse Spark 1.2 in 7 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 50.4 to 28.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 2% for Gemini 2.5 Pro and 17.7% for Muse Spark 1.2.
- Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper at $1.25 / $4.25 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $10 for Gemini 2.5 Pro.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 44.9 | 49.8 |
| Rank | 67 | 44 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $1.25 | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $4.25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.8 (#86)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 48.6 (#49)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1227 | 1532 |
| SciCode | 42.8% | 56.4% |
| WeirdML | 54% | 60.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1452 | 1497 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 57.6% | — |
| DeepSWE | — | 54.9% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 53.6% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 83.1% | — |
| FrontierSWE | — | 12% |
| GSO | 3.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 85.9% | — |
| CadEval | 64% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.52 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.51 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.1 (#81)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 29.5 (#77)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 32.6% | — |
| APEX-Agents | — | 36.4% |
| GDPval | 23.3% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 0.8% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 30.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 13.7% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 42.8% | — |
| BALROG | 43.3% | — |
| GDP.pdf | — | 16% |
| LMArena Search | 1142 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 55.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 573.64 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#85)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 50.4 (#32)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 62.4% | 74.5% |
| CritPt | 2% | 17.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1455 | 1490 |
| DTBench | 82.4% | 94.7% |
| LMCA | 34.8% | 48.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.32 | 155.18 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 70.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.2% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 41% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 5.6% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 89.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 79.9% | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.3 | — |
| LiveBench | 82.3% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 31.9 (#191)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 43.8 (#68)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 24.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 84.7% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 43% |
| Omni-MATH | 41.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 90.2% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1450 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 95.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 14.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.8 (#41)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 53.9 (#49)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | 1485 |
| GPQA Diamond | 85.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 21.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 60.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | 86.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 10.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 74.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 44.5 (#16)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 42.6 (#24)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1263 | 1304 |
| GeoBench | 86% | — |
| VPCT | 48% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1421 | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 44.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.5 (#30)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 57.4 (#10)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1452 | 1479 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1519 |
| LMArena Russian | 1460 | 1494 |
| LMArena French | 1473 | — |
| LMArena German | 1487 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1462 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1435 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.2 (#71)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 77.1 (#30)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1436 | 1466 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 80.6% | — |
| IFEval | 84% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.7 (#5)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 45.4 (#35)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1449 | 1483 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 91.7% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.9 (#60)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 72.6 (#14)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1458 | 1486 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1453 | 1444 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1421 | 1840 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1453 | 1504 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 83.8% | — |
| WildBench | 85.7% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 67.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.5 Pro better than Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.8 to 44.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper. It lists at $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens; Gemini 2.5 Pro lists at $1.25 and $10.

### Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 42.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1.05M tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Pro and Muse Spark 1.2 share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.2 has 28.