# Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Hy3

> Gemini 2.5 Pro and Hy3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (45.0 vs 44.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-hy3
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher in 5 categories and Hy3 in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 59.8 to 44.1.
- Hy3 is cheaper at $0.0825 / $0.33 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $10 for Gemini 2.5 Pro.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- Hy3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 45.0 | 44.2 |
| Rank | 75 | 79 |
| Context | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $1.25 | $0.0825 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $0.33 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.4 (#101)
- Hy3: 46.8 (#63)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1227 | 1508 |
| LMArena Coding | 1452 | 1464 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 57.6% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 53.6% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 83.1% | — |
| SciCode | 42.8% | — |
| GSO | 3.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 54% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 85.9% | — |
| CadEval | 64% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.52 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.51 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.2 (#88)
- Hy3: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 32.6% | — |
| GDPval | 23.3% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 0.8% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 30.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 13.7% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 42.8% | — |
| BALROG | 43.3% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1142 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 55.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 573.64 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#99)
- Hy3: 26.1 (#136)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1455 | 1447 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 62.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 70.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 41.2% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 41% | — |
| CritPt | 2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 5.6% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 89.8% | — |
| DTBench | 82.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 79.9% | — |
| LMCA | 34.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.32 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.3 | — |
| LiveBench | 82.3% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 32.5 (#213)
- Hy3: 40.1 (#93)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1450 | 1475 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 24.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 84.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 41.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 90.2% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 95.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 14.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 56.0 (#46)
- Hy3: 40.8 (#114)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | 1460 |
| GPQA Diamond | 85.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 21.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 86.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 10.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 74.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 45.2 (#18)
- Hy3: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1263 | — |
| GeoBench | 86% | — |
| VPCT | 48% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1421 | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 44.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.3 (#31)
- Hy3: 53.5 (#65)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1451 | 1426 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1493 |
| LMArena French | 1472 | 1461 |
| LMArena German | 1487 | 1439 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1461 | 1392 |
| LMArena Korean | 1434 | 1395 |
| LMArena Russian | 1461 | 1432 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1456 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.0 (#75)
- Hy3: 75.1 (#70)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1437 | 1426 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 80.6% | — |
| IFEval | 84% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.8 (#5)
- Hy3: 44.1 (#75)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1449 | 1442 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 91.7% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.7 (#62)
- Hy3: 62.2 (#81)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1458 | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1454 | 1402 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1453 | 1436 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 83.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1421 | — |
| WildBench | 85.7% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 67.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.5 Pro better than Hy3?

Gemini 2.5 Pro and Hy3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (45.0 vs 44.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Hy3?

Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0825 per million input tokens and $0.33 per million output tokens; Gemini 2.5 Pro lists at $1.25 and $10.

### Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or Hy3 better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 42.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 2.5 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Pro and Hy3 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78 scored results on Noometry and Hy3 has 19.