# Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10

> Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.9 to 38.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-hunyuan-large
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 55.8 to 34.5.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 44.9 | 38.0 |
| Rank | 67 | 183 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $1.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.8 (#86)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 37.6 (#177)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1452 | 1307 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 57.6% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 53.6% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 83.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1227 | — |
| SciCode | 42.8% | — |
| GSO | 3.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 54% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 85.9% | — |
| CadEval | 64% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.52 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.51 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.1 (#81)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 32.6% | — |
| GDPval | 23.3% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 0.8% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 30.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 13.7% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 42.8% | — |
| BALROG | 43.3% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1142 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 55.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 573.64 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#85)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 24.5 (#147)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1455 | 1286 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 62.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 70.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 41% | — |
| CritPt | 2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 5.6% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 89.8% | — |
| DTBench | 82.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 79.9% | — |
| LMCA | 34.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.32 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.3 | — |
| LiveBench | 82.3% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 31.9 (#191)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 33.1 (#178)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1450 | 1281 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 24.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 84.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 41.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 90.2% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 95.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 14.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.8 (#41)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 34.5 (#188)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | 1276 |
| GPQA Diamond | 85.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 21.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 86.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 10.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 74.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 44.5 (#16)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1263 | — |
| GeoBench | 86% | — |
| VPCT | 48% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1421 | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 44.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.5 (#30)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.1 (#195)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1452 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1346 |
| LMArena Russian | 1460 | 1266 |
| LMArena French | 1473 | — |
| LMArena German | 1487 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1462 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1435 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.2 (#71)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.6 (#192)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1436 | 1277 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 80.6% | — |
| IFEval | 84% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.7 (#5)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#144)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1449 | 1342 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 91.7% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.9 (#60)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.9 (#191)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1458 | 1288 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1453 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1453 | 1284 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 83.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1421 | — |
| WildBench | 85.7% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 67.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.5 Pro better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?

Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.9 to 38.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?

Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.8 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Pro and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.