# Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Hunyuan Large Vision

> Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-hunyuan-large-vision
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan Large Vision in 1 category; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 56.0 to 34.4.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 45.0 | 37.6 |
| Rank | 75 | 202 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $1.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.4 (#101)
- Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1452 | 1308 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 57.6% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 53.6% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 83.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1227 | — |
| SciCode | 42.8% | — |
| GSO | 3.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 54% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 85.9% | — |
| CadEval | 64% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.52 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.51 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.2 (#88)
- Hunyuan Large Vision: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 32.6% | — |
| GDPval | 23.3% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 0.8% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 30.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 13.7% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 42.8% | — |
| BALROG | 43.3% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1142 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 55.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 573.64 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#99)
- Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1455 | 1257 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 62.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 70.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 41% | — |
| CritPt | 2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 5.6% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 89.8% | — |
| DTBench | 82.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 79.9% | — |
| LMCA | 34.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.32 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.3 | — |
| LiveBench | 82.3% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 32.5 (#213)
- Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1450 | 1268 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 24.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 84.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 41.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 90.2% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 95.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 14.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 56.0 (#46)
- Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | 1252 |
| GPQA Diamond | 85.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 21.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 86.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 10.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 74.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 45.2 (#18)
- Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1263 | 1180 |
| GeoBench | 86% | — |
| VPCT | 48% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1421 | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 44.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.3 (#31)
- Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1451 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1287 |
| LMArena Russian | 1461 | 1243 |
| LMArena French | 1472 | — |
| LMArena German | 1487 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1461 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.0 (#75)
- Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1437 | 1251 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 80.6% | — |
| IFEval | 84% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.8 (#5)
- Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1449 | 1280 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 91.7% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.7 (#62)
- Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1458 | 1263 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1454 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1453 | 1254 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 83.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1421 | — |
| WildBench | 85.7% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 67.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.5 Pro better than Hunyuan Large Vision?

Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?

Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Pro and Hunyuan Large Vision share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.