# Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Grok 4.1

> Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.9 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-grok-4-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Grok 4.1 in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 55.8 to 38.9.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 44.9 | 40.8 |
| Rank | 67 | 135 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $1.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.8 (#86)
- Grok 4.1: 33.4 (#246)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1227 | 1214 |
| LMArena Coding | 1452 | 1445 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 57.6% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 53.6% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 83.1% | — |
| SciCode | 42.8% | — |
| GSO | 3.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 54% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 85.9% | — |
| CadEval | 64% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.52 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.51 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.1 (#81)
- Grok 4.1: 33.8 (#47)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 32.6% | — |
| GDPval | 23.3% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 0.8% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 30.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 13.7% | — |
| Cybench | — | 39% |
| DeepResearch Bench | 42.8% | — |
| BALROG | 43.3% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1142 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 55.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 573.64 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#85)
- Grok 4.1: 28.3 (#91)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1455 | 1436 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 62.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 70.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 41% | — |
| CritPt | 2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 5.6% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 89.8% | — |
| DTBench | 82.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 79.9% | — |
| LMCA | 34.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.32 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.3 | — |
| LiveBench | 82.3% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 31.9 (#191)
- Grok 4.1: 36.2 (#124)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1450 | 1422 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 24.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 84.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 41.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 90.2% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 95.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 14.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.8 (#41)
- Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#129)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | 1417 |
| GPQA Diamond | 85.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 21.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 86.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 10.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 74.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 44.5 (#16)
- Grok 4.1: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1263 | — |
| GeoBench | 86% | — |
| VPCT | 48% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1421 | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 44.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.5 (#30)
- Grok 4.1: 53.6 (#64)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1452 | 1425 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1464 |
| LMArena French | 1473 | 1448 |
| LMArena German | 1487 | 1447 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1462 | 1396 |
| LMArena Korean | 1435 | 1407 |
| LMArena Russian | 1460 | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1438 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.2 (#71)
- Grok 4.1: 74.0 (#106)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1436 | 1400 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 80.6% | — |
| IFEval | 84% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.7 (#5)
- Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#96)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1449 | 1416 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 91.7% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.9 (#60)
- Grok 4.1: 62.6 (#71)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1458 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1453 | 1411 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1453 | 1438 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 83.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1421 | — |
| WildBench | 85.7% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 67.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.5 Pro better than Grok 4.1?

Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.9 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or Grok 4.1 better for coding?

Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.8 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Pro and Grok 4.1 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 has 19.