# Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini Advanced 0514

> Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-gemini-advanced
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Gemini Advanced 0514 in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 56.0 to 33.3.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Google |
| Noometry Index | 45.0 | 37.7 |
| Rank | 75 | 197 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $1.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.4 (#101)
- Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1452 | 1255 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 57.6% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 53.6% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 83.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1227 | — |
| SciCode | 42.8% | — |
| GSO | 3.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 54% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 85.9% | — |
| CadEval | 64% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.52 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.51 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.2 (#88)
- Gemini Advanced 0514: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 32.6% | — |
| GDPval | 23.3% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 0.8% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 30.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 13.7% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 42.8% | — |
| BALROG | 43.3% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1142 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 55.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 573.64 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#99)
- Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1455 | 1248 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 62.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 70.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 41% | — |
| CritPt | 2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 5.6% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 89.8% | — |
| DTBench | 82.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 79.9% | — |
| LMCA | 34.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.32 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.3 | — |
| LiveBench | 82.3% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 32.5 (#213)
- Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1450 | 1272 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 24.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 84.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 41.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 90.2% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 95.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 14.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 56.0 (#46)
- Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | 1215 |
| GPQA Diamond | 85.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 21.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 86.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 10.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 74.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 45.2 (#18)
- Gemini Advanced 0514: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1263 | — |
| GeoBench | 86% | — |
| VPCT | 48% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1421 | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 44.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.3 (#31)
- Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1451 | 1274 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1274 |
| LMArena French | 1472 | 1307 |
| LMArena German | 1487 | 1275 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1461 | 1242 |
| LMArena Korean | 1434 | 1232 |
| LMArena Russian | 1461 | 1283 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1242 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.0 (#75)
- Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1437 | 1253 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 80.6% | — |
| IFEval | 84% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.8 (#5)
- Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1449 | 1253 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 91.7% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.7 (#62)
- Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1458 | 1279 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1454 | 1284 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1453 | 1269 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 83.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1421 | — |
| WildBench | 85.7% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 67.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.5 Pro better than Gemini Advanced 0514?

Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or Gemini Advanced 0514 better for coding?

Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Pro and Gemini Advanced 0514 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78 scored results on Noometry and Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17.