# Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

> Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 39.3 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 2.5 Flash costs 3.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.6 Max Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-5-flash-vs-qwen3-6-max-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 22

## Summary

- They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.6 Max Preview in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads 41.7 to 18.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SimpleBench: 41.2% for Gemini 2.5 Flash and 63% for Qwen3.6 Max Preview.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash is cheaper at $0.30 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $1.30 / $7.80 for Qwen3.6 Max Preview.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.3 | 51.5 |
| Rank | 170 | 43 |
| Context | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $1.30 |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | $7.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 35.8 (#220)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.7 (#54)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1424 | 1471 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 76.7% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 28.7% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 55.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1482 |
| WeirdML | 41.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 661.88 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 30.8 (#74)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | 548.84 | 4,254 |
| Terminal-Bench | 17.1% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 56.2% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 41.1% | — |
| BALROG | 33.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 18.1 (#286)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 41.7 (#53)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 41.2% | 63% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1422 | 1457 |
| DTBench | 76.5% | 87.2% |
| LMCA | 27.5% | 42.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 143.03 | 149.24 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 2.5% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 56.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 33.3% | — |
| CritPt | 1.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| EnigmaEval | 2.7% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 19% |
| ForecastBench | 60.6 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 39.9 (#98)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.1 (#46)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 73.1% | 91.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1415 | 1465 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.8% | 23.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | 4.2% |
| Omni-MATH | 38.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 36.4 (#168)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#39)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1426 | 1478 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.4% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 12.1% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 52% |
| MMLU-Pro | 63.9% | — |
| Confabulations | 16.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 39% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 41.8 (#32)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1253 | — |
| GeoBench | 76% | — |
| VPCT | 46.2% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 36.9% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 52.3 (#88)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.2 (#48)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1409 | 1437 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1450 | 1487 |
| LMArena French | 1433 | 1449 |
| LMArena Russian | 1415 | 1445 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1421 | 1454 |
| LMArena German | 1418 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1385 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 75.7 (#54)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.7 (#55)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1405 | 1438 |
| IFEval | 89.8% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 47.5 (#17)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#61)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1419 | 1457 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 77.8% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 53.8 (#157)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 63.8 (#60)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1417 | 1447 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | 1435 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1408 | 1456 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 76.5% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1137 | — |
| WildBench | 81.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.5 Flash better than Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 39.3 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 2.5 Flash costs 3.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.6 Max Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Gemini 2.5 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 Max Preview lists at $1.30 and $7.80.

### Is Gemini 2.5 Flash or Qwen3.6 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.7 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 2.5 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen3.6 Max Preview share?

22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29.