# Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Qwen3.6 Flash

> Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen3.6 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.0 vs 38.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-5-flash-vs-qwen3-6-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.6 Flash in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.6 Flash leads 28.4 to 18.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 73.1% for Gemini 2.5 Flash and 84.4% for Qwen3.6 Flash.
- Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper at $0.19 / $1.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Gemini 2.5 Flash.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.0 | 38.4 |
| Rank | 162 | 176 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.19 |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | $1.13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 35.5 (#210)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ALE-Bench | 661.88 | 326.4 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 28.7% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 55.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 41.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1424 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 30.6 (#67)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 17.1% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 56.2% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 41.1% | — |
| BALROG | 33.5% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 548.84 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 18.2 (#271)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 28.4 (#90)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 41.2% | 35.2% |
| DTBench | 76.5% | 77.1% |
| LMCA | 27.5% | 31% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 143.04 | 143.26 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 2.5% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 56.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 33.3% | — |
| CritPt | 1.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| EnigmaEval | 2.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1422 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| ForecastBench | 60.6 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 38.1 (#87)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 38.0 (#88)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 73.1% | 84.4% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.8% | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | 0% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 22.5% |
| Omni-MATH | 38.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1415 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 36.1 (#162)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.2 (#90)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 12.1% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | 63.9% | — |
| Confabulations | 16.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 39% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1426 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 41.2 (#31)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1254 | — |
| GeoBench | 76% | — |
| VPCT | 46.2% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 36.9% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 52.5 (#83)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1410 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1450 | — |
| LMArena French | 1433 | — |
| LMArena German | 1419 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1403 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1385 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1415 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1421 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 75.9 (#50)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 89.8% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1405 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 47.5 (#16)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 77.8% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1419 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 54.0 (#153)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1417 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 76.5% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1137 | — |
| WildBench | 81.7% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1408 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.5 Flash better than Qwen3.6 Flash?

Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen3.6 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.0 vs 38.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Qwen3.6 Flash?

Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.19 per million input tokens and $1.13 per million output tokens; Gemini 2.5 Flash lists at $0.30 and $2.50.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 2.5 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen3.6 Flash share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.