# Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Olmo 3 32b Think

> Gemini 2.5 Flash and Olmo 3 32b Think score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.3 vs 38.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-5-flash-vs-olmo-3-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemini 2.5 Flash leads 52.3 to 41.2.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 39.3 | 38.7 |
| Rank | 170 | 183 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 35.8 (#220)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1424 | 1319 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 28.7% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 55.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 41.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 661.88 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 30.8 (#74)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 17.1% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 56.2% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 41.1% | — |
| BALROG | 33.5% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 548.84 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 18.1 (#286)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1422 | 1302 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 2.5% | — |
| SimpleBench | 41.2% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 56.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 33.3% | — |
| CritPt | 1.1% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 2.7% | — |
| DTBench | 76.5% | — |
| LMCA | 27.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 143.03 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.6 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 39.9 (#98)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1415 | 1316 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 73.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 38.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 36.4 (#168)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1426 | 1273 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 12.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 63.9% | — |
| Confabulations | 16.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 39% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 41.8 (#32)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1253 | — |
| GeoBench | 76% | — |
| VPCT | 46.2% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 36.9% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 52.3 (#88)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1409 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1450 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1433 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1418 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1415 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1385 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1421 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 75.7 (#54)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1405 | 1275 |
| IFEval | 89.8% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 47.5 (#17)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1419 | 1296 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 77.8% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 53.8 (#157)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1417 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1408 | 1290 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 76.5% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1137 | — |
| WildBench | 81.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.5 Flash better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

Gemini 2.5 Flash and Olmo 3 32b Think score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.3 vs 38.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemini 2.5 Flash or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.