# Gemini 2.5 Flash vs MiniMax M1

> Gemini 2.5 Flash and MiniMax M1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.0 vs 39.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-5-flash-vs-minimax-m1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash scores higher in 6 categories and MiniMax M1 in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiniMax M1 leads 25.8 to 18.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Fiction.LiveBench: 77.8% for Gemini 2.5 Flash and 69.4% for MiniMax M1.
- Both cost about the same: $0.30 input and $2.50 output per million tokens.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
- MiniMax M1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.5 Flash | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 39.0 | 39.7 |
| Rank | 162 | 146 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | $2.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 35.5 (#210)
- MiniMax M1: 39.2 (#149)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1424 | 1359 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 28.7% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 55.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 41.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 661.88 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 30.6 (#67)
- MiniMax M1: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 17.1% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 56.2% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 41.1% | — |
| BALROG | 33.5% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 548.84 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 18.2 (#271)
- MiniMax M1: 25.8 (#125)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1422 | 1340 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 2.5% | — |
| SimpleBench | 41.2% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 56.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 33.3% | — |
| CritPt | 1.1% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 2.7% | — |
| DTBench | 76.5% | — |
| LMCA | 27.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 143.04 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.6 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 38.1 (#87)
- MiniMax M1: 34.8 (#152)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1415 | 1360 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 73.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 38.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 36.1 (#162)
- MiniMax M1: 35.7 (#168)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1426 | 1316 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 12.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 63.9% | — |
| Confabulations | 16.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 39% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 41.2 (#31)
- MiniMax M1: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1254 | — |
| GeoBench | 76% | — |
| VPCT | 46.2% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 36.9% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 52.5 (#83)
- MiniMax M1: 46.0 (#157)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1410 | 1320 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1450 | 1361 |
| LMArena French | 1433 | 1369 |
| LMArena German | 1419 | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1403 | 1220 |
| LMArena Korean | 1385 | 1263 |
| LMArena Russian | 1415 | 1330 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1421 | 1354 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 75.9 (#50)
- MiniMax M1: 69.5 (#169)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1405 | 1312 |
| IFEval | 89.8% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 47.5 (#16)
- MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#136)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 77.8% | 69.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1419 | 1326 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 54.0 (#153)
- MiniMax M1: 53.3 (#155)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1417 | 1343 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | 1298 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1408 | 1335 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 76.5% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1137 | — |
| WildBench | 81.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.5 Flash better than MiniMax M1?

Gemini 2.5 Flash and MiniMax M1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.0 vs 39.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash or MiniMax M1?

Gemini 2.5 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; MiniMax M1 lists at $0.40 and $2.20.

### Is Gemini 2.5 Flash or MiniMax M1 better for coding?

MiniMax M1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.2 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 2.5 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash and MiniMax M1 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax M1 has 18.