# Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Kimi K2.7 Code

> Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 2.5 Flash costs 2.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.7 Code's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-5-flash-vs-kimi-k2-7-code
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 7

## Summary

- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash scores higher in 1 category and Kimi K2.7 Code in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 38.2 to 18.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 73.1% for Gemini 2.5 Flash and 95.6% for Kimi K2.7 Code.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash is cheaper at $0.30 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $0.95 / $4 for Kimi K2.7 Code.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- Kimi K2.7 Code has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 39.0 | 43.0 |
| Rank | 162 | 90 |
| Context | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.95 |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | $4 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 35.5 (#210)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.4 (#92)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 41.9% | 54.1% |
| ALE-Bench | 661.88 | 886.23 |
| DeepSWE | — | 30.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 30.1% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 28.7% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 55.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1473 |
| SciCode | — | 47.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1424 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 30.6 (#67)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 23.9 (#115)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | 548.84 | 5,083 |
| Terminal-Bench | 17.1% | — |
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.6% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 56.2% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 41.1% | — |
| BALROG | 33.5% | — |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 18.2 (#271)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 38.2 (#56)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 41.2% | 57.9% |
| CritPt | 1.1% | 10% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 143.04 | 150.01 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 2.5% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 56.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 33.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| EnigmaEval | 2.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1422 | — |
| DTBench | 76.5% | — |
| LMCA | 27.5% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 48.8% |
| ForecastBench | 60.6 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 38.1 (#87)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.6 (#39)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 73.1% | 95.6% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 54% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 12.2% |
| Omni-MATH | 38.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1415 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 36.1 (#162)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.6 (#51)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 12.1% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 36.5% |
| MMLU-Pro | 63.9% | — |
| Confabulations | 16.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 39% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1426 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 41.2 (#31)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1254 | — |
| GeoBench | 76% | — |
| VPCT | 46.2% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 36.9% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 52.5 (#83)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1410 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1450 | — |
| LMArena French | 1433 | — |
| LMArena German | 1419 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1403 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1385 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1415 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1421 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 75.9 (#50)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 89.8% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1405 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 47.5 (#16)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 77.8% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1419 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 54.0 (#153)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1417 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 76.5% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1137 | — |
| WildBench | 81.7% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1408 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.5 Flash better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 2.5 Flash costs 2.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.7 Code's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Kimi K2.7 Code?

Gemini 2.5 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code lists at $0.95 and $4.

### Is Gemini 2.5 Flash or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 2.5 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.