# Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Hunyuan T1 20250711

> Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-5-flash-vs-hunyuan-t1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash scores higher in 4 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 27.3 to 18.2.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 39.0 | 41.8 |
| Rank | 162 | 114 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 35.5 (#210)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1424 | 1389 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 28.7% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 55.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 41.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 661.88 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 30.6 (#67)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 17.1% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 56.2% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 41.1% | — |
| BALROG | 33.5% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 548.84 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 18.2 (#271)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1422 | 1399 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 2.5% | — |
| SimpleBench | 41.2% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 56.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 33.3% | — |
| CritPt | 1.1% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 2.7% | — |
| DTBench | 76.5% | — |
| LMCA | 27.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 143.04 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.6 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 38.1 (#87)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1415 | 1414 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 73.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 38.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 36.1 (#162)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1426 | 1395 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 12.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 63.9% | — |
| Confabulations | 16.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 39% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 41.2 (#31)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1254 | — |
| GeoBench | 76% | — |
| VPCT | 46.2% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 36.9% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 52.5 (#83)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1410 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1450 | 1424 |
| LMArena Korean | 1385 | 1403 |
| LMArena Russian | 1415 | 1384 |
| LMArena French | 1433 | — |
| LMArena German | 1419 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1403 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1421 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 75.9 (#50)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1405 | 1375 |
| IFEval | 89.8% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 47.5 (#16)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1419 | 1384 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 77.8% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 54.0 (#153)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1417 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | 1391 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1408 | 1393 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 76.5% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1137 | — |
| WildBench | 81.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.5 Flash better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.5 Flash or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.