# Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Gemma 3n E4b IT

> Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.3 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-5-flash-vs-gemma-3n-e4b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash scores higher in 6 categories and Gemma 3n E4b IT in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemini 2.5 Flash leads 75.7 to 66.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 56.8% for Gemini 2.5 Flash and 31.5% for Gemma 3n E4b IT.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Google |
| Noometry Index | 39.3 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 170 | 206 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 35.8 (#220)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1424 | 1268 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 28.7% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 55.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 41.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 661.88 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 30.8 (#74)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 17.1% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 56.2% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 41.1% | — |
| BALROG | 33.5% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 548.84 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 18.1 (#286)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 56.8% | 31.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1422 | 1284 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 2.5% | — |
| SimpleBench | 41.2% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 33.3% | — |
| CritPt | 1.1% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 2.7% | — |
| DTBench | 76.5% | — |
| LMCA | 27.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 143.03 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.6 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 39.9 (#98)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1415 | 1251 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 73.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 38.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 36.4 (#168)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1426 | 1246 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 12.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 63.9% | — |
| Confabulations | 16.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 39% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 41.8 (#32)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1253 | — |
| GeoBench | 76% | — |
| VPCT | 46.2% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 36.9% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 52.3 (#88)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1409 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1450 | 1309 |
| LMArena French | 1433 | 1330 |
| LMArena German | 1418 | 1311 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | 1272 |
| LMArena Korean | 1385 | 1259 |
| LMArena Russian | 1415 | 1288 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1421 | 1305 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 75.7 (#54)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1405 | 1255 |
| IFEval | 89.8% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 47.5 (#17)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1419 | 1276 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 77.8% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 53.8 (#157)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1417 | 1306 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | 1287 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1408 | 1276 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 76.5% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1137 | — |
| WildBench | 81.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.5 Flash better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?

Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.3 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.5 Flash or Gemma 3n E4b IT better for coding?

Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.