# Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Wizardlm 13b

> Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-5-flash-lite-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads 56.8 to 30.5.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 37.0 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 211 | 274 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.10 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.5 (#173)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1373 | 1035 |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 325.9 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.0 (#96)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 36.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 22.2 (#205)
- Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1377 | 1018 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.5% | — |
| DTBench | 62.8% | — |
| LMCA | 18.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.94 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#144)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1373 | 1017 |
| Omni-MATH | 48% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.5 (#210)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 53.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1373 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 29.1 (#114)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1198 | — |
| VPCT | 30% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.3 (#134)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1369 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1388 | — |
| LMArena German | 1389 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1359 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1360 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1373 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1396 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0 (#168)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1367 | 1048 |
| IFEval | 81% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#262)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1054 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 47.2% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 56.8 (#135)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1379 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1367 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1366 | 1047 |
| WildBench | 81.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than Wizardlm 13b?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.