# Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3.7 Flash

> Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-5-flash-lite-vs-qwen3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 32.1.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.10 / $0.40 for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.4 | 39.5 |
| Rank | 208 | 152 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.10 | $0.03 |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | $0.13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#167)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1373 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 325.9 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 27.8 (#89)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 36.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 21.5 (#196)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.93 | 144.62 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1377 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| DTBench | 62.8% | — |
| LMCA | 18.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 35.5 (#144)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| Omni-MATH | 48% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1373 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.1 (#206)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | 53.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1373 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.6 (#109)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1198 | — |
| VPCT | 30% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.5 (#129)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1369 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | — |
| LMArena French | 1388 | — |
| LMArena German | 1390 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1359 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1373 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1396 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.2 (#163)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 81% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1366 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#257)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 47.2% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 57.0 (#130)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1379 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1366 | — |
| WildBench | 81.8% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1367 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite lists at $0.10 and $0.40.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.