# Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3-1.7B

> Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-5-flash-lite-vs-qwen3-1-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3-1.7B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads 38.0 to 16.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard: 36.9% for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and 28.4% for Qwen3-1.7B.
- Qwen3-1.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.0 | 26.6 |
| Rank | 211 | 336 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.10 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.5 (#173)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1373 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 325.9 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.0 (#96)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 36.9% | 28.4% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 22.2 (#205)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1377 | — |
| DTBench | 62.8% | — |
| LMCA | 18.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.94 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#144)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
| Omni-MATH | 48% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1373 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.5 (#210)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 38% |
| MMLU-Pro | 53.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1373 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 29.1 (#114)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1198 | — |
| VPCT | 30% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.3 (#134)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1369 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | — |
| LMArena French | 1388 | — |
| LMArena German | 1389 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1359 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1360 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1373 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1396 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0 (#168)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 81% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1367 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#262)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 47.2% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 56.8 (#135)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1379 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1367 | — |
| WildBench | 81.8% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1366 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than Qwen3-1.7B?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Qwen3-1.7B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.