# Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen Plus

> Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Qwen Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.0 vs 37.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-5-flash-lite-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen Plus in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads 38.0 to 23.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 40.5% for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and 63.3% for Qwen Plus.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.20 for Qwen Plus.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.0 | 37.1 |
| Rank | 211 | 210 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.10 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.5 (#173)
- Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1373 | 1328 |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 325.9 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.0 (#96)
- Qwen Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 36.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 22.2 (#205)
- Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.5% | 63.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1377 | 1317 |
| DTBench | 62.8% | 81.1% |
| LMCA | 18.1% | 24% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.94 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#144)
- Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1373 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| Omni-MATH | 48% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.5 (#210)
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1373 | 1328 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | 53.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 29.1 (#114)
- Qwen Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1198 | — |
| VPCT | 30% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.3 (#134)
- Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1369 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1359 | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | 1373 | 1323 |
| LMArena French | 1388 | — |
| LMArena German | 1389 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1360 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1396 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0 (#168)
- Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1367 | 1303 |
| IFEval | 81% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#262)
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1324 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 47.2% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 56.8 (#135)
- Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1379 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1367 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1366 | 1336 |
| WildBench | 81.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than Qwen Plus?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Qwen Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.0 vs 37.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Qwen Plus?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Qwen Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.20.

### Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Qwen Plus better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (38.5 vs 38.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Qwen Plus share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.