# Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Mistral Nemo

> Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-5-flash-lite-vs-mistral-nemo
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 5 categories and Mistral Nemo in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads 56.8 to 28.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 62.8% for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and 48.6% for Mistral Nemo.
- Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.10 / $0.40 for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
- Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 37.0 | 26.4 |
| Rank | 211 | 337 |
| Context | 1.05M | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.10 | $0.15 |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | $0.15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.5 (#173)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1373 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 325.9 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.0 (#96)
- Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 36.9% | 27.6% |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 22.2 (#205)
- Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 62.8% | 48.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.94 | 118.68 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1377 | — |
| LMCA | 18.1% | — |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |

## Math

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#144)
- Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 48% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1373 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10.8% |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.5 (#210)
- Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 29.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | 53.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1373 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 29.1 (#114)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1198 | — |
| VPCT | 30% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.3 (#134)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1369 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | — |
| LMArena French | 1388 | — |
| LMArena German | 1389 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1359 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1360 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1373 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1396 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0 (#168)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 81% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1367 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#262)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 47.2% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 56.8 (#135)
- Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1379 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1367 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 881 |
| WildBench | 81.8% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1366 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than Mistral Nemo?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Mistral Nemo?

Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite lists at $0.10 and $0.40.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Mistral Nemo share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.